Chapter l Introduction - - 001
I.I The object of the study - - 001
1.2 The rationale of the present research - - 007
1.3 Problems existing in the past studies - - 009
1.4 0bjectives of the current researc.h - - 011
1.5 Data of the research - - 013
1.6 Notes on methodology and terminology - - 019
1.7 The outline of the dissertation - . . - .. - . . - . . - 021
Chapter2 Literature Review - - 022
2.1 Introduction……….. - 022
2.2 Terminological issues - - 022
2.3 Approaches to evaluation - - 024
2.4 Achievements and limitations in the past researches - 045
2.5 Summary… - 047
Chapter 3 A Description of the Conceptual Framework - 048
3.1 Introduction ~ - 048
3.2 The working definition of DE - - 048
3.3 Deliruitation of DE - - 057
3.4 A sketch of the theoretical basis - - 063
3.5 The conceptual framework of the present research . . . . . . . . . . . . 075
3.6 Summary～ - 083
Chapter 4 A Classification of DEs in Military Interviews - 085
4.1 Introduction ~ - 085
4.2 Additive DE -- - 086
002 A Pragmatic Study of Deliberate Evaluation in Military Interviews
4.3 Substitutive DE - - 098
4.4 Digressive DE - - 102
4.5 Interruptive DE - - 108
4.6 Competitive DE - - 113
4.7 Summary… - 119
Chapter 5 Adaptability of Deliberate Evaluation - - 121
5.1 Introduction ~ - 121
5.2 Self-oriented adaptation - .. - . . - . . - .. - . . - . . - 122
5.3 0ther-oriented adaptation . - . . - . . - .. - . . - . . - 135
5.4 CJroup-oriented Adaptation - - 146
5.5 Sururuary… - 158
Chapter 6 Functions of Deliberate Evaluation - - 160
6.1 Introduction……….. - 160
6.2 DE, rapport management and identity construction - 161
6.3 Communicative func.tions of'' DE in military interviews - 163
6.4 Summary～ - 206
Chapter 7 Conclusion - - 209
7.1 Introduc.tion……….. - 209
7.2 Major findings - - 210
7.3 Implications………._ - 220
7.4 Limitations of the present study - - 222
7.5 Suggestions for future study - - 223
References……… - 226
Acknowledgements - - 242
Appendix Transcription Conventions - - 244
后记----------------------- - 246
內容試閱：
1.1 The object of the study
Evaluation is a ubiquitous language phenomenon in human
communication. both in written texts and in verbal interactions.
Volosinov 1973 pronounces that no utterance can be put together
without value judgement. and it is evaluation that determines
referential meaning. Richards 1964 conceptualizes two functions
of language, one is scientific. the other emotive. Hayakawa 1972
identifies three modes of information exchange-report, inference
and judgment. More recently, Hurvitz and Schlesinger 2009 claim
that evaluations lie at the heart of every discussion. Thus. it is not
surprising that there is a notable upsurge of interest in the study of
evaluation in recent years.
購物車/收銀台(
0
) | 在線留言板
| 付款方式
| 運費計算
| 聯絡我們
| 幫助中心 |
加入書簽
HOME
新書上架
